Monday, January 30, 2017

The Grace in Weakness

“For God's foolishness is wiser than human wisdom, and God's weakness is stronger than human strength.”  1 Cor. 1:25

The Reverend Luther Zeigler
4A Epiphany – January 29, 2017
  
         Let us pray: Gracious and loving God, who chose what is foolish to shame the wise and what is weak to shame the strong, save us from the vanities of this world and the conceits of our own minds, so that we might find grace in weakness and become fools for your love’s sake. In Jesus’ name. Amen.
         That prayer, of course, is based upon today’s epistle lesson, in which St. Paul reminds us that what the world perceives to be weakness and foolishness is often a sign of God’s grace.  I will always associate St. Paul’s words with a story from my days as a middle school chaplain.  There was a young boy – I’ll call him Jimmy – who was then in seventh grade and one of my few students who seemed genuinely interested in chapel.  Jimmy often helped me with worship in quiet ways – as an acolyte, or usher, or crucifer – but his real dream was to stand up in front of everyone and proudly and articulately read one of the lessons.  The trouble was that Jimmy had a bit of a stutter; and for that reason, he was mortified about speaking in public, and always declined to serve as a reader, much as he wanted to.
         I felt torn about the issue, because on the one hand, I certainly never wanted to put Jimmy in a position of embarrassment; yet, on the other, I desperately wanted to help him overcome his fear so that he could fulfill his deep desire to read the Scriptures aloud with clarity and confidence. Uncertain how to proceed, one day over lunch in the faculty room, I sought the advice of a friend and colleague, Sarah, who also happened to be Jimmy’s history teacher. I have a thought, Sarah said:  I’m currently doing a unit on World War II and my intention next week is to show the class the (then-recently released) movie, The King’s Speech, which, Sarah said, may make enough of an impression on Jimmy to inspire him to confront his fears about his speaking challenges and to take a risk.
         The King’s Speech, as you may remember, is the story of King George VI, known to his family as “Bertie,” who had imperial leadership thrust upon him quite unexpectedly.  The second son of George V, Bertie was a shy and awkward boy, in contrast to his older brother, Edward, who was debonair, confident, and handsome.  Everyone always assumed Edward would become the future king, not only because he was older and therefore next in line to the throne, but also because he simply seemed more fit to be king.
         Moreover, little Bertie suffered from one other difficulty that posed an obstacle to becoming king:  like Jimmy, he stammered badly.  In public settings, Bertie would become so utterly afraid to speak that he could not put two words together without stumbling.  Bertie had all the wealth in the world, all the power of nobility, all the privileges that come with royalty, and yet none of this did him any good because he could not do the one thing people expect of a future king:  to speak with eloquence and authority. 
         And then Bertie’s greatest fear comes to pass:  upon the death of his father, George V, Bertie’s older brother, Edward, infamously abdicates the throne, and Bertie is forced to become king against his wishes. And not only that, but Bertie takes the throne near the outbreak of WWII, at a time when the British people desperately need confident and sure and articulate leadership, which only adds to Bertie’s overwhelming sense of panic.
         The heart of the movie is about how Bertie faces the demon of his stuttering through an unlikely relationship with an eccentric, failed actor, who has made a modest reputation working as a speech therapist.  For the rest of the movie, we watch these two men, from dramatically different backgrounds, come to know, and trust, and help one another, so that they might together overcome the fear that underlies the King’s stuttering.  It is a touching story about human vulnerability, and about the grace that is present when people put aside their differences to face and share in the weaknesses that make us human.
         So, to return to my story, Sarah showed the movie to her eighth grade history class, and it did indeed make the expected impression. Seeing how Jimmy was affected by the film, Sarah, to her great credit, gently took him aside after class and offered to coach Jimmy so that he might be able to fulfill his dream. 
         And so, a few weeks later, Jimmy stepped up to the lectern in chapel, and in front of all the school, read a lesson from our sacred text.  His reading was by no means perfect; there were some stumbles and halts along the way.  But everything else about that moment was perfect – including especially how Jimmy’s words were received. As I looked out at all the students as they listened to Jimmy speak, I could see in their faces that they knew how high the stakes were for him.  Like me, they were hanging breathlessly on Jimmy’s every word, praying silently to themselves that he would make it through to the end of the lesson. And when Jimmy finally got to the refrain that always closes our lessons, “The Word of the Lord,” a raucous cheer broke out.  Never before have I heard a group of kids respond, “Thanks be to God,” with such utter abandon.
         Like Jimmy, each of us has his or her own vulnerability, and all the anxieties that go with it.  For some of us it may well be a fear of speaking in public.  For others, it may be an intense insecurity, an emotional problem, an isolating sense of loneliness, a physical disability, an addiction, or something else.  But whatever it is, each of us, precisely because we are human, has some weakness that is part and parcel of who we are. 
         The message of the King’s Speech, and the power of St. Paul’s teaching about the grace in weakness, is not some sentimental message that all will be well if we just try hard enough.  Nor is it that we can always overcome our weaknesses.  We often cannot.  The real lesson lies in the insight that true grace comes when we share our vulnerabilities with others, when we together name our weaknesses and understand them, and when, with God’s help, we together move through them. 
         This, too, is one of the deep truths of the Epiphany season in which we find ourselves.  What amazed the three wise men the night they visited the baby in the manger was not merely the fact that God reaches out to humanity in the birth of Jesus, but how God does so. God chooses to appear as the most vulnerable thing on earth:  an innocent baby, born to homeless peasants, in a desolate and forgotten part of the world, to a people persecuted and oppressed by one of the most powerful human empires on earth.  God chooses to be most present where humanity is most vulnerable. 
         God is with us in our weakness.  And the corollary to this truth is that we are called, in turn, to open ourselves up to the vulnerabilities of others, and to be present to them in their weakness.  The great German theologian, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, expressed it this way:  "We must learn to regard people less in the light of what they do or omit to do, and more in the light of what they suffer."  To notice and reach out to another human being in her suffering, and to stand in solidarity with her, is the essence of the divine.
         And that is precisely why Jesus begins his famous Sermon on the Mount with the completely counterintuitive words of the Beatitudes that we heard in our gospel lesson. Jesus invites his disciples to see God’s blessing in values that the world may well view as ‘weak’ and ‘foolish’ – blessed are the humble, the meek, the peacemakers, the pure.  Blessed are those who detach themselves from material things, who persevere in the face of adversity, who thirst for righteous and just living, who weep and care for those who suffer.  Blessed are those who do these things, Jesus assures us.
         As the theologian Stanley Hauerwas explains, “the Beatitudes are not a heroic ethic,” but instead they are “the constitution of a new people.”  These blessings are not so much a list of moral requirements as they are a description of a community gathered by and around a heavenly vision of reckless love for all that is precious and fragile in the human condition.  “You cannot possibly live by the demands of the Beatitudes on your own,” Hauerwas writes, “but that is the point.  Their demands are designed to make us depend upon God and one another.” 
         We are living in an uncertain and frightening time; a time when our country is turning away the weakest among us, and acting more from a place of fear than compassion.  Our place in history is perhaps not as different from the first century world into which our Savior was born as we like to think. As we seek to find our bearings in the midst of such chaos, let us not be misled by the hollow words of the powerful who purport to lead us; but instead, let us follow Jesus. Let us welcome the stranger, house the displaced, feed the hungry, find blessing in weakness, and look upon each other in our sufferings as much as in our accomplishments.  And together with Bertie and Jimmy and all our other fellow-sufferers, let us keep this prayer close to our hearts:  

         “Gracious and loving God, who chose what is foolish to shame the wise and what is weak to shame the strong, save us from the vanities of this world and the conceits of our own minds, so that we might find grace in weakness and become fools for your love’s sake.  We pray these things in Jesus’ name.  Amen.”

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

Called to Love

“As Jesus walked by the Sea of Galilee, he saw two brothers, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea — for they were fishermen. And he said to them, "Follow me, and I will make you fish for people." Immediately they left their nets and followed him. As he went from there, he saw two other brothers, James son of Zebedee and his brother John, in the boat with their father Zebedee, mending their nets, and he called them.” Matthew 4:18-21


A photo of your Chaplain in Capernaum by the Sea of Galilee (March 2014)

The Reverend Luther Zeigler
Epiphany 3A – January 22, 2017

            I want to begin my reflection this evening with a note of thanksgiving. As some of you know, this past week our dear friend and Kellogg Fellow, Olivia Hamilton, received her Holy Orders from our bishop, Alan Gates, and she is now on her way toward ordination to the priesthood. Those of us who have come to know and love Olivia as a preacher, teacher, pastor and friend are hardly surprised by this news. We are, however, delighted to learn that the Church shares our view about Olivia’s gifts.
            This momentous occasion in Olivia’s life is not only an opportunity for our community to rejoice in her good news, but it is, fortuitously enough, a perfect illustration of the “call and response” theme that is at the heart of today’s gospel.  As I’m sure Olivia will tell you, discerning a call is a complex activity, requiring prayer, reflection, conversation, attentiveness, patience, support from loved ones and the community, hard work, and most especially, grace. What you may not appreciate, however, is that this activity of discerning a call is by no means restricted to those of us called to ordained life; every baptized person – everyone one of us gathered here this evening – is being called by Christ into new and healthier ways of living.  And discerning the ways in which you are being called is every bit as important a matter as the call to ordination.
            So let’s see what we can learn from our text about the nature of ‘call’:  The scene of our story is Capernaum, the little town by the Sea of Galilee that is the home of two pairs of brothers: Peter and Andrew, on the one hand, and James and John, on the other.  It is in a sense the birthplace of Christian community because it is here, as we just heard, that these first four disciples were called to follow Jesus; and, as we learn later in Matthew’s gospel, it is in and around Capernaum that the Matthew too will eventually be called as a disciple.
            One thing intriguing about these ‘call’ stories in the gospels is just how spare they are in their detail.  I find myself wanting to know so much more.  Do these first disciples follow Jesus because they have previously heard about him and have been drawn in by Jesus’ teaching and personal charism, or is this their very first encounter with him?  The text is ambiguous on the point. Matthew describes the scene as if there is no struggle or hesitation in the brothers’ decision to follow, yet surely there must have been some conversation between and among them before making such a momentous decision.
            The traditional take on the scene is that their immediate decision to follow Jesus’ invitation is a model of faithful and obedient discipleship. But we should probably take care not to sentimentalize the story.  The one thing their subsequent conduct teaches us is that, just like you and me, these brothers are confused and broken people, who often have little clue as to what Jesus is up to and often act out of very mixed motives.
            The truth is that we really don’t know what was running through their minds at this pivotal moment. For all we know, the brothers may have seized this chance to follow Jesus not because they then knew him to be the Son of God, but because they were dying to escape the monotonous life of fishing everyday or of living in a small and dreary town.  I mean who wouldn’t?  I doubt that their future in this tiny village held much promise.
            Honestly, the character in this story that plays on my sympathies most is poor Zebedee, James’ and John’s father.  He is the one who doesn’t follow.  The text is ambiguous here too, as to whether Jesus’ invitation to follow is extended just to the sons, James and John, or whether it was intended to include Zebedee the dad as well.  But surely, if there is one thing we know about Jesus, it is that he always errs on the side of inclusion rather than exclusion.  So, I somehow suspect that Jesus would have welcomed Zebedee as a disciple as well.
            Yet, Matthew tells us that Zebedee stays behind.  This I understand.  Maybe it is because I’m a father myself, I don’t know.  But I can much more easily put myself in Zebedee’s shoes than any of the other characters in the story.  Zebedee no doubt had worked long and hard to build his little fishing business, to buy or build his own boat, to raise his two boys with his wife, Salome.  And like most fathers, he probably dreamed that his boys would someday take over his fishing business, and he probably also hoped that they would stick around and take care of Zebedee and Salome, and maybe give them grandkids.
            And so, Zebedee should be forgiven, I think, if he may have been a little angry under these circumstances, being abandoned by his boys so that they might follow this upstart rabbi on God knows what kind of adventure.  It all must have seemed a little reckless to him.  Like a good and responsible father, Zebedee was probably more worried about who was going to put bread on the table.
            So, why does Jesus do this?  Why does he ask Peter and Andrew and James and John to follow him when he can see that this means breaking a family apart, leaving a mother and father stranded, disrupting a family’s business?
            As Olivia reminded us at our retreat yesterday, when we were studying this same text, an important clue can be found in the simple words of Jesus’ invitation:  “Follow me and I will make you fish for people.  Jesus’ very first utterance about discipleship is not about becoming a teacher of the gospel, or an activist for the kingdom; but he speaks of becoming fishers of people. More than just a clever play on words, Jesus is telling us something important about what it means to follow him.  He is calling these first disciples not into work but into relationship.  He is telling us to put down what we are doing – to put down our nets, and to set aside our boats – and to focus instead on the people around us. 
            Jesus is calling the disciples not so much away from their work and their family as he is calling them toward a form of relationship that is even more primary and fundamental than family bonds. Just as the Godhead itself is a perfectly loving relationship of three persons – Father, Son and Holy Spirit – so too are we called into newer and deeper relationships with each other anchored in this divine reality.
            Jesus invites us to be in genuine and real relationships, and to be in those relationships the same way Jesus was in relationship with his disciples: bearing each other's burdens, caring for each other and especially the vulnerable, holding onto each other through thick and thin, always with the hope and promise of God’s abundant grace. Sometimes that call -- to be in Christ-shaped relationship with others -- will take us far from home and sometimes it will take shape in and among the persons right around us. But it will always involve persons -- not simply a mission or a ministry or a movement, but actual, flesh-and-blood persons.  Yes, we are called by God into our work; but perhaps even more fundamentally, we are called into relationships that are generative, supportive, and life-giving.

            So, my invitation to you as we begin another term together is this: listen prayerfully to the myriad ways in which Christ is calling you into new and healthier relationships.  What stranger does Christ want you to befriend? What friend does Christ want you to support? Whose pain can you relieve? Whose need can you fill?  With whom can you find a holy and life-giving intimacy?  And by all means don’t forget about your relationship with yourself, which for many of us is often the most problematic of all – for Christ wants you to love yourself in the very same unconditional way he loves you.  All of these relationships – with others, with ourselves, and with God – require a Christ-like attention because they are foundational to our identities as followers of Jesus.  None of this is to say, I hasten to add, that Christ is not also calling us into certain forms of Kingdom-building work, and certain forms of Kingdom-building activism.  But it is to say that none of that is possible unless and until we first answer the call to love.